Once again, I went to go see a play that
lisekatevans was in, this time with Black Button Eyes Productions. The last show of theirs I went to see was
Whisper House, a musical involving ghosts, which sounds much cooler than my final impressions of the play were. It was disjointed, with the "singing ghosts" and the "exploration of prejudice during World War II" parts never really coming together in a satisfying way. That's not the fault of Black Button Eyes, of course, since they didn't write the script (Duncan Sheik did), and the acting and singing was good, but it was true nonetheless.
Kind of giving away the game here.
If you look at the
page for the show and read the review excerpts, you'll see they praise the casting and the special effects and mostly do not mention anything about the story. And there's a reason for that.
But first, as the reviews say, the casting and the special effects were good! The actor playing Cornelius Agrippa (the older wizard mentor) had great stage presence and timing.
lisekatevans played two characters--a lady's maid and a cacklingly evil servant of the Ancients, giant Lovecraftian monsters threatening England--and looked like she was having a great time leaping around the stage and issuing dire threats of vengeance from her master. The special effects for all the magic being performed were very good, with a lot of lights of various colors and what
lisekatevans said were called "Kakubi streamers" that packed a
ton of material into small packages so that it looked like streams of fire were coming from the actors' hands. My favorite trick was probably when Henrietta Howel, the protagonist, was being needled by one of her fellow magic students and they kept swapping out the paper globe representing the size of her fireball as her emotions surged. The tentacles sneaking in from when Korozoth, the Shadow and Fog, attacks London were surprisingly realistic-looking for stage prop tentacles.
Alright, so.
A Shadow Bright and Burning is an adaptation of a young adult fantasy novel, and it's hard to tell if my problems with the story are due to the original story or the adaptation. Some of them are definitely due to the difficulty of switching mediums--especially early on in the play, there is a
lot of "As you know" dialogue to explain what's going on. For example, the play begins with a description of the three types of mages: sorcerers, who calmly allowing the elements to flow through them and enact their will; magicians, who use trickery and deceit and illusion; and witches, who use the "power of nature," whatever that means. Not that it matters because not a single witch appears in the story. Early on, Henrietta will
narrate some of her actions, which seemed counter to the entire point of a stage play to me, like saying that she slipped into the covers and was almost instantly asleep instead of just acting it out. Or the way that there's a lot played up with the relationship between Henrietta and Rook, her childhood friend without magic who was marked by the Ancients and bears scars related to them, and then Rook disappears for big chunks of the play. Those are definitely problems with the adaptation.
But the original story is very clearly
Shadow and Bone crossed with a bit of
Harry Potter. Main character in a mundane profession (schoolteacher), who discovers her secret magical powers. She is proclaimed the Chosen One, destined to save the country, and taken away to a sorcerer's school to be trained. She is an orphan, who knows very little of her parents, and is the only known female sorcerer. Why this is so rare and believed impossible is never explicitly stated but is implied to be because sorcery requires supreme control and emotional calm and ladies be crazy, which we could pass off as a representation of misogyny that the main character has to overcome except:
Spoilers for an eight-year-old book
Henrietta is not a sorcerer, she's a magician. Her father was a magician and she inherited his magician powers, which...seems to confirm that women are too emotionally unstable to be sorcerers? Admittedly I'm basing this off the play and maybe the book goes into it more, but in the book there are two (one) female sorcerers. One of them went crazy due to dreams sent by the Ancients and devoted herself to their service, and the other isn't a sorcerer at all. So I guess those Victorian mores about women are right? That doesn't seem intentional.Henrietta studies her powers, deals with her fellow students (as well as Rook), faces threats, and at the end loses her mentor but has a triumph that shows she is ready for future. You've seen it all before and I don't think there's anything new or interesting here other than the Lovecraftian monsters, but despite them sending dreams to people they seem to act more like kaijū. Korozoth repeatedly attacks London and has to be driven off, there's some dialogue indicating that Nemneris the Water Spider is cruising around the English Channel and the North Sea just sinking any British ships it can find. They're not exactly incomprehensible, though this is a young adult book so maybe that's the point.
It is definitely A [Noun] of [Noun] and [Noun] story.
Afterwards,
lisekatevans and I went out with one of her coworkers and her coworker's friends, who all met at Bavarian Instrument-Making School (I think it was
this one). We had a nice conversation about politics (German and American), what to do in the Bavarian Alps in the winter (cook), and Philadelphia vs. Chicago (they're all in Chicago now). It was a lovely evening.